-
WEBSITE
WordReference Forums
Active forums about languages and translation. Questions en espagnol ou en français sur le sens et la traduction d'une langue à l'autre de mots, expressions ou tournures contextualisés .
Do more...
Share, comment, bookmark or report
-
WEBSITE
classified into or classified as | WordReference Forums
Aug 28, 2020. #3. lingobingo said: No. Classified as is correct. It’s similar to described as or categorised as. Into would need a different verb, such as sorted or grouped into classes/categories. I found the following information on the website and I am a little big confused.
Do more...
Share, comment, bookmark or report
-
WEBSITE
Data or Datas? - WordReference Forums
Data ORIGIN mid 17th cent. (as a term in philosophy): from Latin, plural of DATUM. USAGE: In Latin, data is the plural of datum and, historically and in specialized scientific fields, it is also treated as a plural in English, taking a plural verb, as in the data were collected and classified.
Do more...
Share, comment, bookmark or report
-
WEBSITE
es muerto / está muerto | WordReference Forums
My other short answer. estar (root of the word"estado" as in"state") is for categories of changeable things. Health is variable: está bien, está enfermo, está peor, está muerto. On the other hand, ser is used for essential characteristic, nature (categories). if someone is just, at his core, a rotten, evil son of a bitch, es malo.
Do more...
Share, comment, bookmark or report
-
WEBSITE
Classify in vs. Classify into | WordReference Forums
Fresno CA. English (US - northeast) Oct 16, 2018. #2. In my opinion"into" is correct, and"in" is a sloppy replacement for"into". I don't think"in" has a different meaning. But I dislike this sentence, because it uses 2 different words (class/category) with identical meanings. That may confuse readers.
Do more...
Share, comment, bookmark or report
-
WEBSITE
w/, with - WordReference Forums
Mar 3, 2011. #11. In text-speak, w/ = with, is very common. To do the opposite, people (used to) generally use the other slash w\ = without. I've noticed a drop in the trend of the backslash though, probably because people were confused with the ordering of the slashes and now I'd say what James mentioned earlier is the most common (w/o).
Do more...
Share, comment, bookmark or report
-
WEBSITE
in terms of / in the sense of | WordReference Forums
It can be classified as low complex - high uncertain market on the classification grid (specific name). I assume you have a suitable expression to replace the red text. You can find lots of examples of any phrase in context if you use the forum's Dictionary and Thread Title search. I looked up in the sense of.
Do more...
Share, comment, bookmark or report
-
WEBSITE
early/middle/late+month - WordReference Forums
I don't know for sure. But just to get the ball rolling, here's a possible theory, given a 30 day month. Early = 1st to 10th. Mid = 11th to 20th. Late = 21st to 30th. Beginning of (included in early) = First 5 days = 1st to 5th. End of (included in late) = Last 5 days = 26th to 30th.
Do more...
Share, comment, bookmark or report
-
WEBSITE
"Question to" or"for" someone? | WordReference Forums
As it is a title, you can expect there to be some words omitted."Questions to experts" ="Questions that are addressed to experts" (If a document has this title, you could expect a list of questions that ordinary people have asked experts (which would the be followed by the experts' answers.)"Questions for experts" ="Questions for experts to ...
Do more...
Share, comment, bookmark or report
-
WEBSITE
nondegradable vs undegradable - WordReference Forums
Indeed, undegradable does not exist in Webster, etc. but I still find plenty of cases on Google, in particular with regard to biology - e.g 'undegradable proteins'. According to another site 'undegradable' designates 'something which does not degrade easily', whereas 'nondegradable' means 'something which does not degrade at all'.
Do more...
Share, comment, bookmark or report
Comments