Either is used where one is required and there are multiple options, usually two. It can be used for more than two but it is most often is used for only 2 options. In the sentence you're asking about you could say: It can provide either 100, 150, or 400 amps of power. But it will sound better if you say.
The tense of"whichever is sooner" is fine. You may not know offhand which date will occur first, but that both dates will occur is a present-tense fact and, if one does precede the other, whichever date is earlier is also a present-tense fact. This is different than the"will be" of"When I finish building my house, it will be nicer than yours."
9. While Answer 1 is the correct choice when the word"convenient' is related to location, using the word to doesn't apply as absolutely when the meeting's time is under negotiation. To illustrate: It works to say"convenient to you," when you're suggesting that a location can be reached with little effort, like"near to you" or"next to you ...
I will pay you the maximum of $10 and 10% of sales. “The maximum of X and Y” is correct.. Consider that maximum is just Latin for greatest—you’re referring to whichever item in this set of things (joined with and) happens to be greatest—“the greatest of X, Y, and Z”.
There is only one guarantee mentioned, with two possible termination (expiry) dates. So expires, as a normal English word (i.e. not considering any legal or specially defined sense), naturally refers to expiry due to D1 or expiry due to D2. That is, the three terms expires first, comes first and occurs first are equivalent.
Anton is correct for the reasons he states, but often one asks,"Which is greater--A or B", which is a correctly stated question and likely the reason ears often think"the greater of A or B" sounds correct. Perhaps one can avoid the issue by stating,"A or B, whichever is greater."
Walker (1791) says that /ˈiːðə (r)/ and /ˈaɪðə (r)/ are both very common, but gives the preference to the former on the ground of analogy and the authority of Garrick. Smart (1849) says that ‘there is little in point of good usage to choose’ between the two pronunciations, though in the body of his dictionary he, like earlier ...
Lesser of actual physical damage or $1,500 per occurrence. You are not comparing like with like: you cannot compare"physical damage" with a sum of money! What (I assume) you mean to refer to is the cost of repairing the actual physical damage. The correct construction is not the"lesser of A or B": it should be"lesser of A and B".
1) Whichever is less Among very few things (two preferably) 2) Whichever is lesser Used for comparing among two or more number of things . 3) Whichever is the least The thing which is less than all of the other things . Yes, they all may sound like they have the same meaning, and it's mostly up to you whatever sense you want to deliver to the ...
Whatever and whichever, for instance, are both translated with"lequel" in French, so, your explanation is good for native English speakers, but not for people learning the language. The answer below gives the"restricted set of options" would make everything clear.